Facebook admits ‘fact checks’ are nothing more than opinion in court!

As we have previously reported, journalist John Stossel is suing Facebook after Facebook’s ‘fact checkers’ labeled climate change information that Stossel posted as “false and misleading”. In the middle of all this is the nefarious website “Climate Feedback” which has a bunch of climate zealots that write up what they claim are “fact checks” for articles, videos, and news stories they disagree with.

Source… https://www.sott.net/article/461749-Facebook-admits-fact-checks-are-nothing-more-than-opinion-in-court

Facebook just blew the “fact check” claim right out of the water in court.

In its response to Stossel’s defamation claim, Facebook responds on Page 2, Line 8 in the court document (download it below) that Facebook cannot be sued for defamation (which is making a false and harmful assertion) because its ‘fact checks’ aremere statements of opinion rather than factual assertions.

Opinions are not subject to defamation claims, while false assertions of fact can be subject to defamation. The quote in Facebook’s complaint is,

“The labels themselves are neither false nor defamatory; to the contrary, they constitute protected opinion.”

© Watts Up with ThatSo, in a court of law and under oath, Facebook admits that its ‘fact checks’ are not really ‘fact’ checks at all, but merely ‘opinion assertions.’

This strikes me as public relations disaster for Facebook, PolitiFact, and other leftist entities that engage in biased “fact checking.”

Such “fact checks” are now shown to be simply an agenda to suppress free speech and the open discussion of science by disguising liberal media activism as something supposedly noble, neutral, trustworthy, and based on science.

It is none of those.

Here is the court filing:

Facebook-admits-its-fact-check-is-opinion-page-2

https://www.sott.net/article/461749-Facebook-admits-fact-checks-are-nothing-more-than-opinion-in-court

Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.