The first legal action begins with the related complaint, brought by 4 scientists and a lawyer. PCR Test is Fraudulent.

By Matteo Martini

As we have already reported in a previous article , dr. Stefano Scoglio reported to the public attention of the lack of validation and almost total unreliability of the current RT-PCR tests, also on the basis of an analysis by the international foundation FIND, reported by the Istituto Superiore di Sanità which demonstrates how most of the test currently available can produce up to 95% false positives!
Given the current dramatic situation, and the socio-political use made of these mass tests, which have become a source of social alarm, which is seriously testing the socio-economic stability of entire countries, as well as providing for “imprisonment” unjustified fiduciary of hundreds of thousands of completely healthy citizens, unreasonably considered possible infectors, an initiative of formal complaint to the institutions has started to ask for an end to this state of affairs.We enclose the text of the complaint, which anyone can submit to the local Carabinieri Command, text drawn up by the law firm avv. Massafra, on the initiative of dr. Mariano Amici and Stefano Scoglio. To support this initiative, the expertise of four scientists: the infectious disease specialist dr. Fabio Franchi, Stefano Montanari (pharmaceutical chemist and expert in nanotoxicology), Antonietta Gatti and Stefano Scoglio himself. The complaint is against unknown persons.


We report the text of Dr. Stefano Scoglio

A while ago, the brave dr. Mariano Amici, who has already defeated Zingaretti on the obligation to vaccinate in the Lazio Region, after reading my document on tampons
Covid-19, he contacted me to organize legal action against the real engine of this pseudo-pandemic, the swab. Having published two papers that I consider quite definitive on the complete unreliability of the Covid-19 buffer, dr. Amici and the lawyer Massafra, who oversaw the legal development of the action, used these texts and documents as the basis of the complaint. I then summarized the main points of my paper on swabs in an appraisal, and I asked other 3 experienced scientists known for their scientific seriousness, Fabio Franchi, Stefano Montanari and Antonietta Gatti to sign it with me. The first complaint was filed a few days ago by dr. Friends. Now, this complaint, accompanied by the documents to be attached, has been made available to all, so that they can in turn file the complaint, enviously or collectively, at their prosecutor’s office or carabinieri station. Here is a summary of the main reasons for the complaint.

After having ascertained, from a document of the European Commission and one of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (attachments), which declared that the types of tampons circulating in Europe as of May 16, 2020 were 78, none of which authorized, evaluated or validated; and most of which also lack the declaration of the gene sequences contained, we decided to investigate the matter, and we thus verified that:

  • by the same admission of the American Center for Disease Control and the Covid Working Group of the EU Commission, the SARS-Cov2 virus, allegedly responsible for Covid, has not only never been physio-chemically isolated, but also the pathogenic liquids used as a model for gene sequencing did not have any titration of the virus, which implies that these liquids contained billions of other viral-like particles (including non-pathogenic extracellular vesicles naturally present in our organism), and which therefore does not exist to date no virus-specific markers, and therefore no standard that can make swabs reliable.
  • The tampons currently in circulation, over 100, are exempted from the controls provided for by the European law on medical devices of 1997; and yet they are not yet subject to the new European standard of 2017, which will only come into force in May 2022; thus living in a regulatory limbo that makes producers free to circulate any type of device without any control; and nevertheless, it is on the basis of these buffers that a devastating economic-social lockdown has been established and continues to be desired.
  • There are numerous studies that speak of the continuous mutation of the virus, and the health authorities themselves recognize that if the virus continues to mutate, the swabs become useless. There are nearly 150,000 different sequences of the virus in the GISAID virus database;
    they were 70,000 in April; and they continue to grow, because new mutations are always found, and that makes the circulating tampons completely useless.
  • There is also a substantial problem related to the methodology used in the swabs, RT-PCR. As the leading experts of this methodology underline, to work properly this methodology should ideally use between 20 and 30 cycles of PCR;
    ideally, 30 cycles should not be exceeded, and absolutely never 35 cycles, because above this threshold the PCR begins to create completely random sequences. Well, as confirmed by a document organization FIND (which is attached to the complaint), almost all buffers exceed 35-40 average cycles, and are therefore considered to be totally ineffective and production of false positives.
  • Finally, as explained in a recent document from the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, the effectiveness of swabs depends on 3 factors: sensitivity, the ability to detect the presence of RNA, specificity, the ability to limit this RNA to the specific one the virus you are looking for; and the prevalence, that is the presence of the viral pathology in the population. This is because the higher the prevalence, the greater the circulation of the virus, and therefore the greater the possibility of detecting it. To date, the prevalence in Italy, which in true pandemics can even reach 30% of the population, is 0.1%; and even if it increased 10 times it would still be a negligible level of prevalence; which means, based on a table of the authoritative international organization FIND taken from the ISS, that the medium performance tampons, in Italy,
    For all these reasons, it is believed that continuing to use swabs to determine individual or group quarantines, and to impose limitations and lockdowns, from schools to businesses to families, is practice without any scientific basis, and should cease immediately.

Anyone wishing to file a complaint can do so by attaching the written text of the signed complaint and the attached documents that we report.

Documents and forms required to file a complaint:

Sui-Tamponi-Covid-19-1-1 Download

Model-Report-Swabs DownloadExpert-signed Download

EU-test-validation-in-Working-document-test-performance-16-April-2020 Download Download

FIND-evaluation-update-SARS-CoV-2-molecular-diagnostics-FIND Download

Leave a Reply